JFly02
8e19f535ae
Die API v1 ist als Produktgrenze geschärft in [dto.rs](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/crates/infinity_host_api/src/dto.rs>) und [server.rs](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/crates/infinity_host_api/src/server.rs>): getrennte Modelle für `state`, `preview`, `snapshot`, `command response`, `event stream` und stabile Fehlerobjekte mit echten Codes statt generischem Fallback. Dazu kamen `GET /api/v1/state` und `GET /api/v1/preview`, neue persistenzbezogene Commands wie `save_preset`, `save_creative_snapshot`, `recall_creative_snapshot`, `set_transition_style` und `upsert_group`, plus serverseitige Durchreichung der echten Fehlercodes. Die kreative Web-UI in [index.html](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/web/v1/index.html>), [app.js](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/web/v1/app.js>) und [styles.css](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/web/v1/styles.css>) nutzt jetzt genau diese API für Preset-Speichern/Überschreiben, Varianten, Transition-Style, filterbaren Eventfeed und klarere Preview-Darstellung, ohne Parallelarchitektur. Die Doku ist auf den neuen Stand gezogen in [docs/host_api.md](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/docs/host_api.md>), [README.md](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/README.md>), [docs/build_and_deploy.md](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/docs/build_and_deploy.md>) und [docs/architecture.md](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/docs/architecture.md>). Verifiziert habe ich `cargo check -q` und `cargo test -q`; dabei laufen die erweiterten Contract- und Persistenztests in [contract.rs](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/crates/infinity_host_api/tests/contract.rs>) sowie neue Core-Tests in [show_store.rs](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/crates/infinity_host/src/show_store.rs>) und [simulation.rs](</C:/Users/janni/Documents/RFP/Infinity_Vis _Rust/crates/infinity_host/src/simulation.rs>). Nicht separat verifiziert habe ich einen echten Browserlauf der Web-UI; die JS-Datei wurde hier nicht mit `node` geprüft, weil `node` in dieser Umgebung nicht installiert ist.
1.8 KiB
Build and Deploy
Host Side
Required tools:
- Rust stable toolchain
cargo
Suggested commands:
cargo test
cargo run -p infinity_host -- snapshot --config config/project.example.toml
cargo run -p infinity_host_api -- --config config/project.example.toml --bind 127.0.0.1:9001 --runtime-state data/runtime_state.json
cargo run -p infinity_host_ui
cargo run -p infinity_host -- validate --config config/project.example.toml --mode structural
cargo run -p infinity_host -- plan-boot-scene --config config/project.example.toml --preset-id safe_static_blue
The host API server now exposes the common software-first control boundary over HTTP and WebSocket. The creative web UI is served directly from the same process at http://127.0.0.1:9001/. Runtime creative data such as saved presets, groups, active scene state, and creative snapshots are persisted to data/runtime_state.json by default.
The native engineering UI and the CLI snapshot continue to run against the same simulation-backed host core so looks, presets, grouping, and parameter flow can be exercised before transport and firmware integration are complete.
Before any live activation, run:
cargo run -p infinity_host -- validate --config config/project.example.toml --mode activation
Activation mode is expected to fail until the hardware mapping has been confirmed and the config is updated from pending_validation to concrete driver references.
Firmware Side
Required tools:
- ESP-IDF
- Xtensa or RISC-V toolchain matching the actual ESP32 variant
Suggested layout:
firmware/esp32_node/- build with
idf.py build - flash with
idf.py -p <serial-port> flash monitor
The firmware skeleton is intentionally conservative. It will not silently select a backend for UART 6, UART 5, or UART 4.